Posts Tagged Big Ideas

Trust Me!

4
Digg me

Back around 2005 I had an office that when you walked through the main door you were in our production pit. It was usually fine because we were a production company and we didn’t get any walk in business.

One day though, a guy walks into our office and says loudly “Hey there! How ya doing?” We all get up and someone responds, “Hey! Good. You?”

We all look slightly confused as not one of us recognizes the person right off the bat.

He goes on “What are ya doing today? You busy?”

Me, “Fairly. A few things on the go…how about you?”  I’m being extremely friendly, wracking my brain as to who this person is. I’m starting to panic as he knows us and by the look on everyone’s faces we don’t know him! Is he a client?! Is he crew?!

Him-“I’m great! I was thinking about you folks the other day so I thought I would drop by.”

I’m fucked.  I really don’t remember this guy…not uncommon as our client/supplier list is well over 400 people but normally with everyone around we should have someone able to place him…I get the courage.  “I’m so sorry.  I can’t remember your name…”

Him- “No problem it’s Bob! So, the office looks great!”

Me- “Bob, sorry, but how do I know you?” I say smiling.

Bob- “Well, I don’t know if you do, but I have a great selection of books that I’m offering to select company…” I interrupt.  “Wait…You don’t know us?”

I’m not going to say what happened next…it just got stupid..

Funny story and it’s true.  But what’s my point?  There is a line that can’t be crossed during any point in the sales cycle but especially at the very beginning.  Don’t pretend that you know me.  Be friendly and welcoming but don’t fake a relationship!  For me, the second I loose trust within the cycle, I’m out of it and usually very peeved for someone wasting my time.

Now you’re thinking “Bob” is a pretty rare occurrence, but he isn’t.  We just need to see all the “Bob’s” out there for who and what they are.

A few days ago I got an email telling me about a local service.  The way the email was formatted it looked like I would know the person or the company.   I had to wrack my brain the same way as with Bob, only to discover, I didn’t know them! It was a bloody waste of time trying to figure out a connection because there wasn’t any.  It was Spam.  Spam, Spam, Spam!

One of the main rules in sales is you need to gain the targets trust. These people didn’t, in fact just the opposite.  They had no clue about it and it seems to be happening time and again with many other companies and their email marketing.  You get added to an email list, ad hock and without your knowing.

There are multiple reasons for having a person’s permission before adding them to an email list.  The most serious is, without permission, your email is Spam and believe it or not, most hosting companies have rules against sending Spam! I have actually seen hosting companies have their entire list of clients banned from sending emails to other hosting companies.  As such most hosting companies take Spam very seriously now.  Less serous legally, but more important for your sales, you loose your chance to have a conversation with your prospect if you are in the junk mail folder or worse, pissed them off!

Being friendly I sent the Spammer an email a day later explaining a little about email marketing and a couple of pointers as to how she might have been a little more successful in contacting me…….I don’t think she gave a rat’s ass… I believe she thinks, as most people who make the same mistake do, Email Marketing is suppose to be easy and people being pissed off about Spam is just part of the course.  It’s not!  Email Marketing can be a rewarding relationship, if you offer something of value.  If you do, chances are the recipient will let you keep emailing them giving you multiple chances at a sale.  If you offer no value and have not taken the time to make it of value then why would we keep letting you fill our in box and wasting our time?

On the surface Email Marketing  just looks like it would be getting and managing a mailing list.  It’s not. If your are going to put people on an email list, at least take the 20 seconds (if that) to send a personal email to them asking to do so…  Gain a little bit of trust first and then build on it!  It also allows them to say no and them saying no is not all bad.  It gives you information on the prospect (email is legit, signature bar, etc), starts a conversation and allows you to tailor the message better to that prospect and to others (they might have unique needs that you didn’t know about and didn’t tailor your introduction message to).

Let me help you just in case you are still not going to make the effort….

 

Dear (insert company here),

I have come across your company while researching possible clients for our services.  Every now and then we send out information that you might be interested in about (what you do/sell).  We promise that you will find it of use and interesting.  If you don’t want to be included on the mailing list, please let us know and you will not receive anymore emails from us.  Further after receiving any future emails, you can still decide at that time, not to receive anymore.

Thank you for your time and hope we can be of service to you in the future,

 

(your name here..YOUR REAL NAME!)

 

Please feel free to cut and paste, but remember to replace (insert company here) and (your name here) with the appropriate information….nothing says stupid like getting emails with it still there…and I do get them!

 

Anyone remember the old days of Fax spam? …….. Ok, there used to a machine that, when connected up to a regular wired phone line, would transmit black and white images to another Fax somewhere else. Some companies would hire a “Fax marketing company” to send out Spam Ads to any and every fax number in a select area.  It was all about “the list”.  Cheep flights, cheap cruises, cleaning, Fax and copy repair, you name it, it would just appear on your fax machine eating up your toner, paper and God forbid…your thermal paper roll!

Well one day some bright fellow thought of a way to get even.  They would find out the advertisers business Fax number and send them a looped black page, called a “black fax”…ok…A what? A black fax was exactly what it sounds like.  You would tape four pieces of black paper together with a strip of exposed tape at the top so you could join the bottom piece into a roll.  You would dial the offending number, hit send on the fax and as the paper starts feeding through you would take the leading edge of the paper that just went through the Fax scanner and attach it to the last edge so you have an endless loop of black. Unless the person on the other end is paying attention to their Fax, they would end up with no toner or paper or worse….AN EMPTY THERMAL PAPER ROLL!

To the Fax marketing company and their clients, the “list” was everything, until they got feed back (pay back?) from the folks who they pissed off.  Don’t let your email marketing be like Fax Spam! You have to see your prospects as more than a list.  You have to earn trust and the first step in email marketing is to do that!

If anyone discovers a “black fax” trick for spam email, please let me know.  Also, I always wondered whether “Bob’s” tactic worked well in large offices where there was a certain amount of anonymity….I wonder what he is doing now?

 

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

If Walmart sold creative services how much would it cost?

4
Digg me

I have yet to meet a client that truly knows the cost of good creative. Now hang on, notice I wrote cost, not value as I believe they grasp the concept of the “value” of good creative but sometimes they have trouble with justifying the final cost of it.  I really don’t blame them at times as the results seem to vary greatly no matter how much they pay.

 

Marketers will sometimes write off these situations to Client knowledge of creative process.  The creative process takes time and time is money.  Solutions may come in minutes, hours or days…it may come in a creative session or a week later in the shower!  I often answer the question of how long will it take for you to come up with an idea with someone asking an artist how long it took them to come up with the concept to do a particular piece of work (I can’t remember who said it but their answer was all their life).  But I think the problem may go further than Client education.

 

In dealing with Clients we normally layout a budget that spells out what we will spend on creative, managing, execution and media.  The client usually gets the allotted time/dollars for managing, execution and media but I have not worked in or with an agency that has not given more to the creative hours than was billed… So, what is going on? How can a client not see the value if they are getting more than they are being billed?

 

The client looks for proof in the pudding.  Was the product worth the cost? To me, creative should meet or exceed the client expectations for both cost and results. This means it should do what the client asks for and be within brand and budget expectations.  Should it win awards? The client is not paying us to win awards, they are paying us for results foremost and sometimes, when the stars are aligned right, you can achieve awards and I’m also not the first to say such.

 

It seems like a very simple task yet we still see failures.  Where is the process failing in such a simple process?  I believe the failure point comes when the creative team forgets (or doesn’t know any better) the core objectives; solving the Clients communications problems.  It’s quite common and used to be rampant.  There use to be a time when creative teams for larger brands (um, think beer) would do creative based on where they wanted to travel to that year OR what type of dinning room set would look great in their house.  Those days are mostly gone but it’s been replaced with ads done only because the creative team wanted to do that “style” of ad for their portfolio or just didn’t see the Clients problem worth their while to really think about.  In other words, the creative would have very little about being good for the Clients problem.

 

When I see creative that would be great in a portfolio or doesn’t look like anyone read the brief it pisses me off to no end!  Not that the ideas may not be great and could be award winning; it’s that they don’t solve the clients problems and I know I’m going to have to eat those creative costs.

 

I have worked with lots of creative people in this industry and have witnessed the difference in being creative and being able to come up with a “complete idea” that solves all the clients points.  The later will always be considering the clients problems (messaging) with every idea that floats through their head.  The former may have a good idea but fails to fully connect it to (or wrap it around) the Clients points.

 

If I was the client and received an idea that was only half the solution, I wouldn’t put much value on creative! I would start pushing for the lowest cost creative as possible as the solution is not unique to my problem and there are a lot of suppliers delivering the same quality…They use the Walmart strategy; if you can’t supply y for x then someone else will.

 

Here lies the dilemma.  Both suppliers bill out the same amounts for two totally different products and, even more challenging, one may have better looking portfolio than the other but can’t do the same quality of work. Hmmm…maybe it is Client education after all.

 

How do we solve the problem?

 

To be continued…..

 

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

 

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Old Spice Versus Dairy Queen

7
Digg me

Someone once said that imitation is the highest form of flattery. Ok marketing mavens out there! You may or may not have heard me rant over the last year about DQ’s ads, but now that some of you have actually started noticing them I think they are worth another look. What I want to talk about is the apparent blatant imitation. Let’s call a spade a spade; the DQ ads are a rip off of the Old Spice ads (I’m the man you wish you had) that shook the ad world for their recallable-ability. Rip offs really make angry as I’ve had ideas stolen on more than one occasion!

I really loved the previous iteration of the Old Spice ads; heck I even bought some Old Spice deodorant as a result of those ads. For context here is a link to one of the ads.

Very smart creative and brilliant execution…a winning combination.

Simply stated, DQ did a lousy job of stealing the idea. You be the judge….

 

I find the DQ ads childish and…I believe the campaign is a one trick pony, nowhere near as visually and mentally interesting as Old Spice. The DQ campaign has no legs, whereas the Old Spice work is built around a concept that continues to reveal new ideas and executions. Don’t believe me…take a look at the posts and at the views on the Oldspice youtube channel.  http://www.youtube.com/user/OldSpice . That means it continues to get consumer attention. I even see the Old Spice “I’m the man” campaign with even more legs than the Budweiser “true” campaign from many years ago.

 

. ,

 

Back to the point, no one I know in the ad world would have the brass balls to steal a currently running campaign’s big idea. And what really astonishes me about the current DQ creative is that they have done some really creative work in the past.I relate the DQ idea to “we need an idea for this years TV marketing…think quick!  As our current campaign is tanking…

 

Maybe, maybe not.

OK now I vented my spleen it is your turn to comment. Am I right or simply righteous.

 

SW

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Video Production Process

6
Digg me

A while ago a client came to me very confused.  He didn’t know what we expected of him, yet we had just explained the critical path to him at the last meeting and left him with a list of “to-do’s”.  He then confessed that despite being in marketing for a number of years, he had never done video before and didn’t know the process.  He was concerned about the next steps beyond his list and the small details in the critical path laid out at the start of the project.

That was the first time I had someone confess like that and I had a few emotions.  One, I was incredibly happy that we had the type of relationship that he felt he didn’t need to hold back about his concerns and two, I was kicking myself as I had never really laid out a process for making videos.  I have talked clients through the process and made critical paths, but never a process document.  The first thing I did when I got back to the office as spend the next three days laying out “our” process.  I think it will be helpful to all if we share it with you.

PLANNING

Client contacts PHI with interest in having project produced.

Clint supplies PHI with the following information in order for PHI to understand the project and scope:

Message to be expressed within video

Target Audience details(age, gender, education, knowledge of message)

Locations which footage needs to be acquired

Any collateral material

Format of delivery

Specific people that need to be shot (if known)

PHI supplies Client with a Project Work Order which includes a rough estimate for creative, production and payment terms of video.

Client requests changes to Work Order or signs off and supplies PHI with Purchase Order (if required for invoice payment).

PHI sends deposit invoice to Client.

Client sends PHI payment on invoice.  This payment initiates the start of the Project.

RESEARCH AND CREATIVE

PHI meets with Client to discuss messaging and target.

PHI creates 1 to 3 creative ideas(treatments) to solved the messaging.  We do this by researching, interviewing, and discussing the messaging and the target.  This process is one of science and magic.

PHI and Client meet to discuss the creative solutions and Client picks one they like the most.

PHI then develops the creative into a script or outline depending on the solution and approach to the video.  Scripts are good for educational and some marketing videos.  Outlines are great for marketing videos that require interviewing real people to get statements and testimonials.

PHI presents the script or outline to client for signoff.

PHI adjusts budget to reflect final creative and gets signoff if total amounts have changed.

PREPRODUCTION

Depending on the script or outline PHI may do the following:

Storyboards (pictures illustrating the story)

Animation wire frames

Design elements

Research stock footage

Research and find key on screen interviews

Schedule and book travel.

Survey key locations

Cast for on-screen and off-screen talent

PRODUCTION

PHI hires talent and crew (if necessary)

PHI books equipment

In collaboration with Client moves to Footage Acquisition (shooting, stock)

POST PRODUCTION

PHI loads footage into edit system

PHI logs footage

PHI sends selects to Client or Interviewees for approval (if required)

PHI does a ROUGH CUT:

This is where the story is put together.  Most times it will lack colour correction (colour is off, images are too bright or too dark), mixed audio (meaning it might be louder or softer in places), music, graphics, animation.  It may also have time code (numbers at bottom of the video that indicates the frame you are watching and used for people to give us a reference time in the video).

The Client will normally have multiple times to view and make changes to the rough cut.

PHI will also start sending music files to client for review in needed.

PHI does a FINAL CUT:

All the elements come together (final cut of video, music, mixing of audio, graphics, animation, and the colour correction).

Client signs off on the final cut.

COPYRIGHT

Client makes final payment to PHI in order to receive usage rights.

DUPLICATION/USAGE

PHI delivers final deliverable (DVD’s, Blu Rays, Data Disks and/or web uploads).

EVALUATION OF MESSAGING(if budgeted)

PHI researches the effectiveness of the project messaging.

Scott Westerlaken

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Collaboration

4
Digg me
Scott Westerlaken

Scott Westerlaken

Collaboration is a recursive process where two or more people or organizations work together in an intersection of common goals — for example, an intellectual endeavor that is creative in nature—by sharing knowledge, learning and building consensus. Most collaboration requires leadership, although the form of leadership can be social within a decentralized and egalitarian group. In particular, teams that work collaboratively can obtain greater resources, recognition and reward when facing competition for finite resources.

Having worked in communications through two large recessions I know that the companies that survive are the ones that can adapt to the conditions and own them….. I When times are good, we don’t think to much of a client sending one piece of a project to someone else, yet when times are tight we fight like mad to keep all the biz internal….whether or not it might be a good for the clients needs.

As the economy is starting to come to life like a 1976 Chevy pickup one defining practice will be how companies learn how to collaborate with each other.. especially with their competition… WHAT?! Really…  Think about it.  Take your best competition and their best resources and combine them with yours.  Not only do you benefit but so does your client and you gain a completive edge over any other competition!  This idea came to me a few months ago.  I was doing a SWOT on a new start up and one advantage I targeted was the ability to be able to offer varied solutions to clients based on their needs rather than the start ups offerings…a true reversal of “build it and they will come.”

I also looked at the main competition; small one to five person operations with small operating budgets and internal resources.  This was key, as the experience of the start up organization was competing against 5 to 30 person operations with operating budgets of .5 to 3 million and a vast array of internal resources..  Now imagine my glee when I thought of a company that could pick the best of another, combine with its own best attributes and offer it to clients.  Fantastic!

There are the sphincter tightening moments as you might imagine!  The moments where you feel so exposed that you wondered why you thought an idea was great in the first place!  One of my associates looked over at me during the first project we did this on and said “you got balls man…you realize they could steal this client like no ones business?” Ummmmm yeh…. But I had to have faith that the client could see the value we were bringing to the table and at the same time the competition would see the lack of value by stealing the client as it would end any more collaborations.

Now imagine if larger companies stared collaborating in the same way!  The resource power would be incredible…but here is the issue holding organizations back… A company’s ability to collaborate externally is parallel to how well they collaborate internally.  Look at any number of teams or divisions within a company and there will be issues with how they collaborate with one another…do they all fall on the sword when mistakes are made or do they all duck for cover? Not a good scenario for an external collaboration.

Regardless of how you believe this may or may not work for where you are now, one thing I believe is certain, a company’s lack of fear for collaboration will enhance its prospects of success.  No fooling, it is hard to do you and full of risks.  Clients, I believe, will appreciate that you are looking after their best interest and for the best solutions to their issues…. Now who is next?

SW

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , , ,

An Evolution In Advertising & Ads That Make You Go Hmmm.

4
Digg me

I just finished watching the 24th Annual London International Advertising Awards DVD. You gotta love advertising awards reels. After viewing them I always feel that maybe as advertising practitioners we are getting smarter! It’s also a very productive way to waste a few hours watching videos and calling it “research”!

There were a few surprise ads on the reel I had not seen and that blew me away, some that didn’t grab me and some that just left me shaking my head wondering why they rated so high.

The highlight 60 sec. TV spot for me was from Volkswagen. They received a gold TV win for “Dog-Fish”. I loved it on many different levels. The story telling was really well done, the acting was good, but the Visual Effects were fantastic.

Surprisingly, it didn’t win Gold for Visual Effects, that went to Evian “Rollerbabies”, which I find the close up’s of the babies looked really fake.

Truthfully the Evian ad is cute the first time you watch it then it gets more annoying each time around.

The other ad that made me go hmmm was the Nokia N96 gold winning ad “Bruce Lee-ping pong”

Interesting scene, got my attention…but really a Gold for telecommunications? It had me really wanting to see more “Bruce Lee” doing his thing rather than the two folks he was playing….Yet more Hmmmm..

There were some beautiful animation ads this year in the silver category. The Scrabble campaign “Sumo”, “Hula” and “Yoga”. All three also won a silver for original music. I like the ads but personally wonder how well they did for brand and sales.

Bakers Biscuits “Precious Biscuits” spot (silver for animation) was beautiful, but again, I hope it did something for the brand….

Another disappointment, but for different reasons was the Silver winner for Direction, Tampax, “Zack Johnson”. I really think it deserved a gold. The story telling and characters were great.

In a reverse of what the trend has been for years, the Public Service winners over all were a little week. I did like the Gold winner ECPCAT “Child Pornography”, but the silver winners Shelter, “House of cards” , Women’s Aid “Cut” and Anti-Knife Crime (OMG, really?) “Cribs” seemed weak to me.



What grabbed my attention this year was the “New” category. A “New” category?! “Entries for The NEW Category are for work that merges the power of an original idea with a relevant compelling execution. Emotionally inspirational, imaginative work, effectively creating new dialogues, creating new spaces of interaction, altering perceptions, setting new benchmarks that invite and reward at every level of engagement.”

All the winners were fantastic in execution. You got to love clients that are willing to reach out a little…The Grand LIA went to Fiat eco: Drive interesting but I loved a few others more.

“The best job in the world” by Tourism Australia really blew me away when I first heard about it and it still does.

Also the AC/DC Black Ice idea was interesting, especially the Excel spread sheet video…yup, you have to see it to believe it.

The Excel sheet can be downloaded here: http://www.acdcrocks.com/excel/

This category gave me hope that marketers are moving towards an evolution in advertising…when viewers get to a point that they don’t see advertising as advertising…..

All the winners can be found on the LIAA website, http://2009.liaentries.com/winners/ and it’s well worth a look through.  What have presented is just a very small snippet. Would love to hear back on what you liked out of the show!

SW

Scott Westerlaken

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Entitled to our entitlements?

3
Digg me
Chad Wiesner

Chad Wiesner

Having recently become self-employed as a sales and marketing advisor, I have learned how easy it was to take a steady salary for granted.  After 17 years working in the corporate world, a regular income with benefits was definitely earned but, I admit, sometimes taken for granted. Now don’t get me wrong, I have always counted myself among the lucky ones to have worked for companies that have enabled me to develop my career and grow professionally. I’ve learned a lot about how businesses work and the types of people it takes to make them successful.  For that education, I am very grateful.

As an entrepreneur, taking the risk to be self-sufficient and starting something new is, I believe, a commendable career path. I think many people today have either lost sight of, or just don’t have an appreciation for, the contribution that entrepreneurs of all types have made to our province and our country.  They are the backbone of our economy.

So, I must say that I was amused (and somewhat bewildered) to hear about a recent poll conducted among university students.  The poll revealed that the majority of students graduating expected to make at least $42,000 per year at their very first job, and within five years, expected to be in the $70,000 per year range. Those surveyed also expected to be promoted within a year and a half of accepting their first position. Most polled felt justified in their ambitious expectations as they feel they are entitled to the best jobs by virtue of the education costs they have incurred.  Sure, it’s great that these students are so ambitious, and no doubt they are well-educated. However, it does concern me that the majority feel entitled to rapid and lucrative advancement without feeling the need to gain more than a few years experience in the workforce. It also sends a message that many believe they can simply buy their way (via degrees) to success.   Education provides a critical foundation upon which one’s career is built, but it’s worrisome that so many graduates feel a sense of career entitlement based on that alone.

So, what does this mean really?  I think we need to question whether we are doing enough in our school and university systems to cultivate the skills and mindset required to cultivate a new generation of creative entrepreneurs.  In Nova Scotia, and the Maritimes in general,  students hear over and over that our huge public debt and high taxes are reason enough for them to cut bait and head West.  Our educators need to remind students that creativity comes from within and the education you gain, coupled with ambition to build a career here at home, can make a huge difference to our economy and our future.

So, to all those graduating students this month: forget your entitlements, take nothing for granted and get out there and start something new!  You won’t regret it.

Chad Wiesner

Chad has over 17 years of marketing and sales leadership experience with corporate management roles spanning the international export, credit information, manufacturing and telecommunications industries.  A collaborative entrepreneur by nature, Chad has successfully developed and executed strategic marketing plans pertaining to branding, communications, product development and sales for both small and large companies. His “real world” business acumen has taken him from the boardrooms of Fortune 500 companies to the docks of multi-national seafood companies. With an eye for detail, Chad has crafted meaningful marketing strategies and communications plans that encompass the essence of the company and the customers it serves.

Tags: , ,

Lazy Boy and Lazy Creative

1
Digg me

Talking Recliners and Sub Ovens that have Children.

Do you find watching TV a little depressing lately? Well I do.

One evening of viewing and one can’t help but wonder what happened to the creative advertising industry.

Take for example the series of spots that recently aired for Lazy Boy. In each spot we are asked to believe that recliners can talk. Wow what a premise!  Can you imagine the creative brief for this one? If that unbelievable premise ain’t bad enough how about a sub oven that, under physcotherapy, confesses to being a guys parent.

Neither of these spots is funny. Some lazy bastard, or worse a group of them, foisted these pieces of excrement on the client and beat their asses home – where being creatively responsible is not a prerequisite.

Al Graham

From People or Planes 1974 Gordon Willson

From People or Planes 1974 Gordon Willson

Al Graham is a veteran of the advertising wars who once smoked like Mad Men’s Don Draper. He is also a veteran of many social conflict wars and has been actively involved in protesting dumps, airports, expressways and urban sprawl.

Tags: , , , , , ,

The King is dead! Long live the King!

5
Digg me

I could never figure that line out as a kid growing up.  I forget what movie I heard the line in but I know I wasn’t watching the images at the time.  Had I been, I would have seen the old king take his last breath and the crown placed on the young prince.

When websites first started getting attention from marketers in the late 90’s the hot word was “content”.  Things changed after businesses found that content on the web alone didn’t make them money or drive their sales.  Interestingly in the last few years the word keeps popping up again.  “Content Is King”, and surprisingly in the same breath I hear the “Big Idea” is dead.  In fact I was just at a Canadian Marketing Association conference and heard it again.  Thankfully there were defenders of the “Big Idea” concept on the panel.  I’m always left puzzled by the “Content Is King” statements though.

The Internet is a communication medium and people use it to find information or entertainment of some sort (this is over simplified).  The information/entertainment on a website is considered its content. Generally the thinking is the more useful, fresh and interesting the content the website has, the more successful it will be. In theory this is because more people will want to visit it again and again, link to it, and generally talk about.  This is especially true if a website is constantly adding more and more content on a regular basis.  This could also be said about TV, Print and Radio and the strategy leaves a lot to chance.  You could be lost in the clutter!

In the past the “Big Idea” was the game changing concept in traditional marketing and advertising.  This was the “Where’s the beef?” idea.  If you had a good enough idea, theory said you could connect with the consumer, cut through the clutter and the product or service would be a success.  To me, though, the “Big Idea” can be two things:  giving people want they want (whether they know it or not) in a way that is more enjoyable than the competition and/or creating emotion that motivates them to an action.  Right now, the web needs the “Big Idea” more than at any other time to date!

As I see it you can have all the good content in the world, but you can still fail without a great idea.  Case in point are the sites with great content (pets.com, drugstore.com) but had flawed “Ideas”.   All the content in the world could not save them.

bk chickenMy line of thinking is if you combine valuable “Content” with a “Big Idea” you are almost guaranteed success.  On the web, Crispin Porter produced a great example combining the two.  The subservient chicken site, was built a few years ago for Burger King (ironic) to launch their new chicken sandwich and also build the brand slogan, “have it your way”.  Without the “Big Idea” I could easily see this site having been just pictures or descriptions of the many different ways to get your BK Chicken Burger (I’m sure we have all sat through those briefings)…. Instead it was an early micro site viral success!

Most times I will take the “big idea” over “content” (though I would take a million dollars over the idea of a million dollars in a second).  To say that there needs to be no “Big Idea” for successful marketing and websites as long as you have good content is rather foolish.  You are just keeping the door open for the competition to come eat your dinner.  Statements like “Content OR Idea” need to be refined to “Content AND Idea” in order to position yourself best for success.  I am almost thinking that the “Content Is King” line of thinking doesn’t consider monetization of the product? Am I misguided? Maybe I’m just not seeing the King for what the King is?

SW

Scott Westerlaken

Scott Westerlaken

Scott Westerlaken

With over 25 years of award winning experience in marketing, television commercials, film, video, communications, web, radio, print, and events, Scott has the ability to maintain focus on the big picture and offer a wide range of solutions appropriate to the clients message and budget. He has been recognized with dozens of awards in business, communications, and filmmaking from around the world. For the client, this means a truly unique balance of hands on technical knowledge and high level strategic experience that always leads to unique and creative solutions.

Tags: , , , , ,

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes